River Pool at Beacon Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201515620
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Beacon, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8452883852
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Physical Fitness and Community Recreational Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $85,131
- Expenses
- $68,760
- Assets
- $151,166
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALAN ZOLLNER (PRESIDENT)
- KAREN FRILLMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALAN ZOLLNER (PRESIDENT)
- KAREN FRILLMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NOAH ROSALER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Offering safe access for swimming in the Hudson River by providing a free-to-the-public floating, flow-through pool. River Pool At Beacon advocates educating the public about the unique aspects of the Hudson. Created to provide a floating swimming pool along the banks of the Hudson River. Provide safe access to the Hudson River via a facility inexpensive to the general public. Educate the beneral public abount the importance of continuing to preserve and clean the Hudson. Promote swimming as a fun, healthful fitness activity in a natural way. Demonstrate to other communities the vaibility of floating pools by fuilding a successful prototypel
What it reported doing in 2025
Offering safe access for swimming in the Hudson River by providing a free-to-the-public floating, flow-through pool. River Pool At Beacon advocates educating the public about the unique aspects of the Hudson. Created to provide
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.