River Oaks Girls Home Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271085513
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Mount Pleasant, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8434424684
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homes for Children & Adolescents
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,757
- Expenses
- $2,223
- Assets
- $49,009
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- SARAH PAYNE WILSON (CHAIRMAN)
- BETH COLLEY (TREASURER)
- ALEXIS STROBLE (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a safe and stable environment in a parent teaching model home for girls that will give each girl the core skills needed to be adopted by a family and no longer have to remain in state custody. Should adoption not become a reality, they will have the skills to transition into adulthood.
What it reported doing in 2014
The organization takes broken, abused, abandoned girls and breathes life into their emotionally damaged lives, to give them a warm and loving family. We parent the child to meet their individual needs, spiritually, emotionally, mentally, physically and educationally.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.05; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.