Rite Way The

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261391600
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5594726662
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,000
Expenses
$120,000
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WAJIH AJIB (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • WAJIH AJIB (CEO)
  • AEDRYCA AJIB (SECRETARY)
  • JAMEL AJIB (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provided to religious/cultural centers serving immigrants from the Middle East and other nationalities technical assistance in the form of Immigration Seminars where The Rite Way staff informed immigrants on how to adjust correctly their status in the United States, and how to become US Citizens.

What it reported doing in 2021

ORGANIZATIONS PRIMARY EXEMPT PURPOSE AND PROGRAM SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS The organization's primary exempt purpose is to assist individuals and families in need of legal services in the area of immigration and related legal procedures. The organization provided to religious/cultural centers serving immigrants from the Middle East and other nationalities technical assistance in the form of Immigration Seminars and other social activities and community involvements with youth and adults'. . The Rite Way staff informed immigrants on how to adjust correctly their status in the United States, and how to become US Citizens.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 27.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.