Rising Generation Project Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922352606
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Charleston, WV, USA
Phone
7276230934
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$125,000
Expenses
$41,292
Assets
$124,074
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • ADAM KISSEL (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the rising generation project is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a nonprofit corporation may be organized under the general corporation law of the state of Delaware. In particular, the rising generation project is organized to advance the goals of educational excellence and social welfare.

What it reported doing in 2024

Rgp advocated for reforms to american higher education that would improve the education of the next generation, including the development of state and federal policies to improve postsecondary education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 25.7%; rating input score 26
  • Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -69.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 101.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 25.7% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.