Rise Tampa Our Police Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465291016
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$593,156
Expenses
$509,529
Assets
$666,172
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDDY DURKIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHRIS CHAMBERS (DIRECTOR)
  • KAREN COX (DIRECTOR)
  • ANDREAS DETTLAFF (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of rise tampa our police foundation is mainly two-fold. To ensure that officers receive the latest training, safety equipment and cutting edge technology, we support the various units within the tampa police department such as the bicycle unit, the k9 unit and the pistol club. Also, we provide community outreach that makes a difference in the lives of officers and citizens through programs such as resources in community hope (rich) house (safe houses for kids in the community), the explorers (mentoring program for children interested in police careers) and black history.

What it reported doing in 2024

The tampa police department's resources in community hope (r.i.c.h.) house programs serve as a safe haven for kids in sulphur springs and robles park. Tampa police officers serve as a role models, tutors and liaisons between residents and the police department. The sites offer after-school and summer school programming, in addition to access to enrichment and family social services. The program's focus is on education, conflict-resolution, socialization and self-esteem building. One hundred and fifteen (115) students were enrolled during this school year. The black history committee's mission is to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life through a cooperative partnership with all citizens. These partnerships include the historic emphasis of promoting educational awareness of african americans in law enforcement, the importance of diversity and achievement, and maintaining a relationship with the community as a whole. Ten students attending were awarded grants to further their education. The goal of the k-9 unit is to enhance the police department's objectives in providing quality law enforcement service to the community. The specially trained canines accompany their human law enforcement personnel to provide investigative, search and seizure, criminal apprehension and other life-saving activities. This group provides the canines with necessary supplies such as vests and training to accomplish their work. We are currently serving 21 canines. The homeless initiative's goal is to provide compassionate outreach from police officers to the homeless population. Examples of outreach include referrals to social services, temporary and permanent housing assistance, temporary transportation and support in obtaining birth certificates and identification cards. On an average day, the two officers interact with an average of 40 people daily, resulting in a net impact of at least 2,400 homeless individuals for a year. The purpose of the tampa police pistol team is to promote firearms safety, awareness, and proficiency training. The team uses competitive shooting sports as a means to interact with other members of law enforcement and the community and using this experience to provide more efficient training to tampa police officers. The estimated number of people served was 125. The mounted police unit's goal is to enhance and assist the uniform patrol districts, as well as any area of the police department. Mounted patrol officers and their horses are specially trained for crime prevention, public relations, criminal apprehension, dignitary protection, search and rescue, special escorts, crowd control and civil disorder. The horses for the unit, and much of the equipment and training, are acquired through donations. Over the last year, the unit had six mounted officers and six horses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.1%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.1% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $463K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.