Rise for Wildlife Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843021075
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Riverside, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7143429106
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Preservation, Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,006
- Expenses
- $15,927
- Assets
- $13,552
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNA E VANOVER (President)
People named in this filing
- ANNA E VANOVER (President)
- GLENN K BAXLEY (Treasurer)
- JENNIFER HILL (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rise for wildlife inc is a nonprofit corporation organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes, specifically to assist licensed wildlife rehabilitators in dunding rescue, specialized care, and ultimate release of injured, orphaned, trapped, and / or nuisance wildlife. We further our purposes under this program by conducting the following activities: rise for wildlife was designed to support licensed wildlife parties and bringing attention to their mission by informing and educating the public through audio casts, quarterly journals, and other media-based modalities. This organization will also deek grants and donations from large corporations futhering the ability to provide help to wildlife rescuers who are not supplemented financially by any outside entity. Making the plight of the rescuers known though media modalities will help to ensure that animals that are rapidly becoming will have a better chance of survival and provide relief to rehabilitators who give of themselv
What it reported doing in 2020
Packaging $ 500rescue food 1095rehabbers rescue costs 7,605total 9,200
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.8%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 57.8%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 152.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 70.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.8% of revenue deployed · 57.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.