Rio Hondo College Faculty Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237017385
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Whittier, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5626920921
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,280
- Expenses
- $67,992
- Assets
- $245,881
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mike Javanmard (President)
- Jodi Senk (Vice President)
- DIANA VALLADARES (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Mike Javanmard (President): $8,000 total reported compensation
- JEANNIE LIU (Treasurer): $4,500 total reported compensation
- Dorali Pichardo-Diaz (Director): $2,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rio hondo college faculty association's mission is to promote public education and the teaching profession and to represent and serve the interest of its members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Association of college instructors dedicated to provide the highest quality education and services to a diverse student population and community of rio hondo college. Association also works to develop and protect the working conditions of its members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.2%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 41.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.2% of revenue deployed · 58.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.