Rightnow Ministries International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752353393
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Mckinney, TX, USA
Phone
9725605600
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,845,322
Expenses
$36,719,315
Assets
$49,273,123
Liabilities
$7,429,897

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN MOSLEY (PRESIDENT CEO)
  • SCOTT MOSLEY (VICE PRESIDENT OF SOFTWARE AND EXPERIENCE)
  • PHILIP WARNER (VICE PRESIDENT OF VIDEO CONTENT)
  • MERRY PRATHER (VICE PRESIDENT, SALES AND CUSTOMER SUCCESS)
  • MITCH MYERS PART YEAR (VICE PRESIDENT, GLOBAL EXPANSION AND CUSTOMER EXPE)
  • MATTHEW WOOD (VICE PRESIDENT MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRIAN MOSLEY (PRESIDENT CEO): $422,108 total reported compensation
  • PHILIP WARNER (VICE PRESIDENT OF VIDEO CONTENT): $306,136 total reported compensation
  • MERRY PRATHER (VICE PRESIDENT, SALES AND CUSTOMER SUCCESS): $295,802 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To work with the global church to inspire people to love others before self and christ above all.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our team produces and aggregates video-driven discipleship curriculum and distributes this content through an on-line, on-demand streaming library. This content is used by bible study groups, ministries, teams and families to strengthen their faith and to help inspire people to be more intentional in living their faith out every day. Our domsetic program in the us works with 30,000 churches, ministries, schools and businesses to serve their people with discipleship content.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.1%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 73.5%; rating input score 74; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 55.6%; rating input score 56; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.1% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $33.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $422K · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.9M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 40 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.