Right Hand Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
651257940
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,783
Expenses
$96,711
Assets
$16,552

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dan Kissick (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dan Kissick (President)
  • Russel Baker (Board Member)
  • Bill Aynes (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Helping the people to learn about GOD Doing Charitable work among the poor.

What it reported doing in 2025

Christmas Project 5,231; Helping Pastors ministry helpers 1,281; Salaries for those implementing the ministry 3,309; Weekly and monthly meetings 1,044; RHM Misc expenses in India includes fuel & transportation costs admin costs within India itself and many other misc expenses connected with the ministry 5,487; Medical needs not part of childrens or elderly ministry 880; Homeless ministry in Shawnee Oklahoma 102; Dan Kissick RHM President expenses 7,300; RHM admin expenses 4,375; Total expenses not included on lines 28-30: 29,009

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 88% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $97K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.