Ridgeland Band Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993370688
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Rossvile, GA, USA
Phone
4238830084
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,897
Expenses
$58,927
Assets
$8,970
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leslie Myers (President)
  • Carman Woodall (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Leslie Myers (President)
  • Paton Williams (Treasurer)
  • Kristi Argenbright (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ridgeland Band Booster Club (EIN: 99-3370688) was incorporated on 5/8/2024 to support Ridgeland High School instrumental music through fundraising and program support, creating an atmosphere of enthusiastic volunteerism and support within the organization of Ridgeland High School parents, musicians, directors, and the surrounding community to develop

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization contracted independent instructors and designers to provide Marching Band instruction, rehearsals, show design, and competition coaching. The organization sponsored a marching band program for 100+ students, providing them with musical and performance education. The band competed in five events, performed in 14 concerts, and developed valuable teamwork and discipline. Primary outputs were weekly rehearsals, 5 competitions, 10 game performances, and 4 performances specifically for the local community. The organization also contracted independent instructors and designers for the Color/Winter Guard program. The instructors and designers provided rehearsals, show design, and competition coaching for 16 students for the program's Color and Winter Guard performances. The organization's support facilitated student cooperation through teamwork, group coordination/discipline, and performance education. Primary outputs were weekly rehearsals, 2 competitions, 7 game performances, and 2 community performances. The output of this organization served our community by providing events where parents, guardians, and friends could show their support of students and our local high school. Supporting invoices, and event schedules are on file.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.9%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 42.5%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.9% of revenue deployed · 42.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.