Ridgefield Girls Softball Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463417782
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Ridgefield, CT, USA
- Phone
- 6233124540
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,472
- Expenses
- $84,740
- Assets
- $90,963
- Liabilities
- $3,549
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLI FUJITANI (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTOPHER BRACCIA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY)
- JOSHUA BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE)
People named in this filing
- KELLI FUJITANI (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTOPHER BRACCIA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
The board of directors added a fundraising volunteer to focus on activities to fund scholarships for participants and to provide donations to other tax-exempt organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.1%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 43.1%; rating input score 43
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.9%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.1% of revenue deployed · 43.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.