Riddick's Ride Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811164878
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Island Lake, IL, USA
Phone
8006519629
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$177,721
Expenses
$82,677
Assets
$172,243

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTIN QUINONES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KRISTIN QUINONES (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT QUINONES (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SANDRA QUINONES (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission is to raise awareness to inspire & assist those with complex medical needs. We have a lending garage & lend out medical equipment at no cost to families who have children with complex medical needs that otherwise might not have access to this much needed equipment. We do adopt-a-family during the holidays, quarterly blood drives, monthly parking & meal vouchers for lurie's picu patients.

What it reported doing in 2025

Riddick's ride foundation has been established as a way to communicate with and educate others about children with complex medical needs. It is also intended to serve as a forum for families with complex medical needs children to find comfort that they are not alone.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.2%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.5%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.2% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.