Richmond Rosenberg Youth Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473786733
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Rosenberg, TX, USA
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,999
Expenses
$76,185
Assets
$2,571

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Otis Murrell (President)

People named in this filing

  • Otis Murrell (President)
  • Alice Murrell (DOO/Treasure)
  • Damita Roberts (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide affordable youth enrichment programs that promote physical fitness, confidence, discipline, teamwork, leadership, creativity, and character development through dance education, performing arts instruction, youth activities, and community-based programs in a safe and positive environment.

What it reported doing in 2025

1. Youth Dance Education and Training Programs The organization provided weekly dance instruction and performing arts education for children and youth ages 3 through 12 through recreational and performance based classes. Classes focused on developing technical dance skills, self confidence, teamwork, discipline, creativity, and physical fitness in a structured and supportive environment. Programs included ballet, jazz, hip hop, majorette, Kpop, and other youth dance classes. The organization served approximately 200 students and families during the year. 2. Performances, Recitals, and Community Engagement Activities The organization hosted youth performances, recitals, showcases, and community events that allowed students to demonstrate skills learned throughout the year while building confidence, leadership abilities, and community involvement. Events also provided opportunities for family engagement, volunteer participation, and positive youth recognition. The organization coordinated costumes, rehearsals, production activities, and event planning for participants and families throughout the year. 3. Financial Assistance, Scholarships, and Youth Participation Support . The organization worked to reduce financial barriers to participation by providing payment arrangements, sponsorship opportunities, costume assistance, discounted program fees, and other forms of support for families in need. The organization also utilized donated resources, volunteers, and fundraising activities to help make programs accessible to underserved youth within the Richmond Rosenberg area. Approximately 200 youth participants and families benefited from financial assistance or reduced cost programming during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.