Richmond CPCU Society Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464970294
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Glen Allen, VA, USA
Phone
8006442101
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,495
Expenses
$30,283
Assets
$209,554

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tredessa Travers (President)
  • Christopher Townsend (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Janet Buchanan (Director)
  • Tredessa Travers (President)
  • Jennifer Blandford (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Education and Promotion of Insurance.

What it reported doing in 2025

For 2025, the Richmond CPCU Society Chapter continued its mission of providing resources, educational programming, and leadership opportunities that attract talent and enable individuals to expand their technical insurance skills, business capabilities, and ethical leadership within the insurance industry. The Richmond CPCU Society Chapter serves individuals who hold or are pursuing the Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter designation, which is conferred by The Institutes and requires passing rigorous exams, meeting an experience requirement, and adhering to a strict code of professional ethics. This year, the Chapter featured a variety of educational and professional development programs. Knowledge events included an April 2025 webinar, Highwater, Higher Stakes: Insurance Realities from Asheville Residents, presented by Derek Lynch, which focused on the Asheville flooding event, the causes and limitations of available insurance coverage, and the recovery challenges faced by residents. In October 2025, the Chapter supported Crazy Claims, presented at the Virginia RIMS Conference by Chapter President Tredessa Travers, Charity Grzelecki, and Shawn Little, which highlighted unusual and complex insurance claims and the related lessons in policy interpretation, training, fraud awareness, and risk management. The Chapter also offered CPCU continuing education credit for its December webinar, Inclusion in Action: Cultivating an Inclusive Mindset for Workplace Impact, presented by Britani Jones of The Hanover Insurance Group. Ethics and diversity remained important areas of focus for the Chapter in 2025. In March 2025, Richmond CPCU hosted a virtual ethics session featuring Phyllis Davis, author of Navigating Virtue: Ethics and Etiquette in the American Business Landscape, which focused on ethical interactions and workplace etiquette. The Chapter also submitted a proposal to The Institutes in support of Ethics Month. In December 2025, the Chapter collaborated with The Hanover Insurance Group to present a webinar on workplace inclusivity, further supporting diversity and inclusion within the insurance profession. The Chapter also promoted awareness of the CPCU designation and provided outreach to students and insurance professionals. Chapter leaders and members participated in licensing and CPCU-related instruction for local insurance professionals, staffed a vendor table at the Regional GIS Conference, sponsored a VCU GIS student leader to attend In2Risk, and recognized scholarship recipients during the annual golf tournament reception. Chapter leaders also mentored students in risk management and insurance programs at Virginia Commonwealth University and Old Dominion University.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.4%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 58

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.7%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.92; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.4% of revenue deployed · 58.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.