Central Ozarks Medical Center
Legal name: Richland Medical Center D/b/a Central Ozarks Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431183442
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Camdenton, MO, US
- Phone
- (877) 406-2662
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,248,335
- Expenses
- $26,109,696
- Assets
- $16,120,340
- Liabilities
- $6,489,642
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLY MILLER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIO A MACIAS (PHYSICIAN OB/GYN): $440,146 total reported compensation
- BARTON L WARREN (PHYSICIAN): $343,989 total reported compensation
- DANIEL M SCHMIDT (PHYSICIAN): $289,933 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Your Health...Our Mission.
What it reported doing in 2023
Central ozarks medical center (comc) is a federally qualified health center and operates medical clinics at its locations in richland, camdenton, laurie and osage beach, mo. Comc offers medical services to adults, infants and children. Specialty services are available and include obstetrics and gynecology, women's health, mental health, geriatric health, and cardio-pulmonary medicine. Other services are also available in areas such as AIDS, alcoholism, after hours/24 hour call services, home health, nutrition, and social services. Total medical encounters for the fiscal year 2023 were 43,524.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 71.7%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 71.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $440K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.