Richland Elementary School Parent Teacher Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251694494
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Gibsonia, PA, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,529
- Expenses
- $865
- Assets
- $63,792
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lauren Oeler (President)
- Kristen Schaffert (Vice President)
- Apryl Pratt (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Lauren Oeler (President)
- Kristen Schaffert (Vice President)
- Apryl Pratt (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Richland Elementary Schools Parent Teacher Organization PTO promotes the well-being and enrichment of our students through activities that stimulate the physical emotional and cultural growth of our children. The PTOs projects benefit students by developing united efforts between teachers and parents and fostering a closer relationship between home and school life. Our main beneficiaries of the funds raised by our PTO are split into three categories: Student Enrichment assemblies field trips books fairs after-school programs etc. Staff Appreciation teacher startup funds luncheons appreciation week etc. and Community Building events like Family Fun Night Heart Ball and volunteer efforts.
What it reported doing in 2024
Family Fun Night: an event held at the elementary school to gather parents students and faculty for food games and fun social times. The event benefits 400 students plus their families approx 1200 people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 95.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 73.75; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -136.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -98.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.