Richie Mcfarland Children's Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020302005
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Stratham, NH, USA
Phone
6037788193
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voluntary Health Associations & Medical Disciplines N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$634,602
Expenses
$596,427
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRENDA PLANTE (PRESIDENT)
  • HELEN CROWE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET SMALL PORTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARGARET SMALL PORTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $65,927 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The center is an early childhood program whose purpose is to help young children reach their full developmental potential and to support their families through that process.

What it reported doing in 2021

Mission: the richie mcfarland children's center is an early intervention program designed to help young children reach their full developmental potential while educating and empowering families to support and guide their children along their own unique path to success.vision: we envision a community in which all children enter school ready to learn, supported by families that feel confident, empowered and competent in promoting their children's growth and development, as well as serving as advocates for their children.our philosophy: research shows that the first three years of a child's life will directly determine his or her success in school and in life. Rmcc helps children during this most critical stage of development. We promise to treat each child as an individual, to inspire each family member to be a confident caregiver, and to ensure our services reduce or eliminate the need for more extensive, expensive remedial services in the future. Whether a child has a developmental delay related to a specific diagnosis or a parent has a nagging concern that their child needs extra support in one or more areas of growth, staff at rmcc are trained and ready to make a significant, positive impact in the lives of children. Our team of experts give children their best start with the provision of family-centered, evidence-based special education, pediatric therapies (occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech and language pathology), family support and training, care coordination and connections to essential community resources. For very young children, every area of development is interconnected, from walking to talking, listening to playing. The richie mcfarland children's center utilizes a transdisciplinary team approach to deliver intervention services-serving the "whole child' within the family.history: rmcc was founded in 1971 by a small group of seacoast parents raising children with special needs. They were advised by their physicians to place their children in the state institution, as they would become a burden on their family and community. Those parents were determined to create social and therapeutic opportunities for their children that were essential and did not exist locally. The founders realized their goal and established an organization that has been admirably serving the seacoast community for 50 years. Our promise: our children are our future-and our investment in and care for all children will forever correlate with the health, wellness and stability of the future of our community. While, as a collective whole, we have come far in identifying and celebrating the potential of every child we serve, there is still much to be done. With a 50-year history of wisdom at our heels, we confidently are moving into the future as a program of waypoint. Our vision and mission that has guided us throughout our history will be more secure in partnership with an organization with shared values and a strong infrastructure. Together, we commit to delivering on these promises: "keep the needs of each individual child at the center and focus of what we do"partner with parents and caregivers with the understanding that they are the child's primary educator and our role as early childhood specialists is to offer support, guidance, encouragement and empowerment"continue to refine and build upon the expertise of our educators, therapists and service coordinators by investing in training and committing to learn from one another"educate the larger community about the incredible potential and abilities of each and every child, with or without developmental delays or disabilities"remain steadfast in our commitment to best practice and getting better at what we do by learning from the children and families we serve"collaborate with the network of providers serving children and families in order to strengthen the system of support and strive for best possible outcomes for children and their families"advocate for the rights of our most v

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $499K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.