Richardsville Vol Fire Departm & Rescue Squad Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

6 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Volunteer fire and rescue services for area

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Mission deployment rate: Limited
Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Consistency checks: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: Limited
Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.23; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 98.1% of spending went to programs
Governance: 0 of 34 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $319K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 16 of 18 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX DepreciationDepletion column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.