Rhoades School Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330122669
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Encinitas, CA, USA
Phone
7604361102
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,676
Expenses
$51,963
Assets
$197,624
Liabilities
$5,054

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER BOYER (Vice President)
  • CAMILLE WILSON (President)

People named in this filing

  • MARISSA MOSER (Secretary)
  • ZEHRA RIZVI SAYED (Director)
  • JILL ELDER (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The rhoades school foundation (the foundation) exists to serve the families of therhoades school by connecting and supporting the rhoades school community. Thefoundation is a parent-led organization whose chief goal is to support thestudents, parents, and teachers at the rhoades school through community-buildingin the form of fun and educational foundation sponsored events.the foundation efforts are closely aligned with the goals of the rhoades school toensure all efforts add supplemental value to our children's educational andextracurricular experience.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided or supported school enrichment programs for approximately 300 students spread over our 3 campuses. Students at the rhoades school in encinitas, ca. Enrichment programs in academics, the arts, and fitness were supported in order to fulfill the organization's commitment to enhancement of educational opportunities for children with the capacity for high-level intellectual development.encouraging community spirit and involvement is at the heart of the rhoadesschool foundation. Throughout the last year we were able to celebrate ourstudents, teachers, staff, and parents.some of our events included:-field days on all campuses promoting fitness activities for the kids, and a pickball tournament for parents.-provided sports uniforms for our school sports teams. -fall book fairs.-pizza fridays.-fall ice cream social held on both campuses at the rhoades school. Providing music, entertainment and food for the middle school dances. -our new winter glow dance was a fun after-hours activity for students and parents. -spring family carnival event.-diversity day activities including a cultural food celebration and a performance by local cultural groups.-teacher & staff appreciation treats were given every month and all faculty received catered lunch and a relaxation class in spring.this year, the girls rising portion of our organization continued their work with several events, including a culturally focused bazaar, open mic night, and continued sponsorship of girls' education around the world. Students are responsible for all aspects of these activities, which not only promotes the causes, but also teaches project management, team building, and other specialized skills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.8; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.