Rhinebeck Soccer League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141711733
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Rhinebeck, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9178071473
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,477
- Expenses
- $74,130
- Assets
- $93,311
- Liabilities
- $64,195
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Caroline Morton (President)
- Joe Button (Vice President, Operations)
- Laura Charles (Vice President, Recreation)
- Adam Solomon (Vice President, Travel)
People named in this filing
- Caroline Morton (President)
- Joe Button (Vice President, Operations)
- Laura Charles (Vice President, Recreation)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Rhinebeck Soccer League is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing youth of the Town of Rhinebeck and neighboring areas, an opportunity to play soccer, have fun, and learn principles of good sportsmanship, fitness, honesty, and teamwork.
What it reported doing in 2024
Equipment/Balls/Nets-goals were purchased for the turf fieldas well as soccer balls, pennies, nets, and other suppliesneeded to play the sport.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $74K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.