Rheumatology Association of Minnesota and the Dakotas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813072039
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Schaumburg, IL, USA
Phone
8475177225
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$196,475
Expenses
$140,889
Assets
$426,580
Liabilities
$104,841

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Parastoo Fazeli MD (President)
  • Cindy A Weaver MD (Vice President)
  • Jody K Hargrove MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • Parastoo Fazeli MD (President)
  • Cindy A Weaver MD (Vice President)
  • Jody K Hargrove MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purposes of the corporation are charitable, educational, and scientific within the meaning of section 501c6 of the internal revenue code, as amended, including but not limited to, patient safety, protecting the physician-patient relationship, and improving access to health care.

What it reported doing in 2024

The association holds an educational conference to provide information relating to the practice of rheumatology and related treatments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.03; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.