Rhema Housing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651142545
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Powder Springs, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6784031816
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,077,471
- Expenses
- $3,590,637
- Assets
- $3,201,094
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- Marilyn Bragg (Director): $28,201 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide Personal Care Homes, Group Homes, Host Homes for Temporary or Longterm Housing. Personal Support Services to clients in their individual homes. Services, Supplies, Food and Temporarily Housing to the Homeless.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rhema Housing Inc has been serving the community since August 2003. Our services consist of Providing Services to persons who are Disabled. We have provided care to over 3000 individuals and families. Our organizational services consist of: Personal Care Support Services Aides to Disabled Persons in their homes. Personal Care Support includes assisting with shower, bed baths, dressing, transferring from bed to wheelchair, meal preparation, errands, etc for Persons who have diagnosis with: Spinal Cord Injury: Quadriplegics, Paraplegics Traumatic Brain Injury: Head Injury, Stroke, Aneurysm, Tumor Arthritis/Rheumatism Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease Personal Care Homes serving Veterans, Elderly, etc. Group Home serving persons with Mental Health Serving the Homeless during Covid 19 by providing temporary housing, food, supplies, etc Providing housing placement for disabled persons Assist persons with home buying process Our organization will continue to provide Personal Care Support and Housing Assistance and services to help with homelessness. We have recently been chosen to help with homeless prevention for young adults who are being released from foster care. Project in Progress: Rhema Transitional Living Program: Our Transition Program will provide housing and services to young women, ages 16-22, who are either in the care of the Division of Family and Children Services DFCS or who have become homeless. The program will assist female clients for a period of 18 months to develop skills leading to self-sufficiency and independence, while providing a safe living environment. Youth will reside in our homes or apartment setting, where all basic needs are met, including transportation for work school or health purposes. In addition to building our programs, Douglas County Juvenile Public Defenders Office, Douglasville, GA has agreed to serve as our advisor as we pursue contracting with Division of Family Children Services as we intend to support youth in their transition out of foster care to live independently.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 10
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 97.3%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 97.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.