Rhawnhurst Turning Point

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263532280
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2676015147
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Centers, Clubs
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,082
Expenses
$69,726
Assets
$17,365

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JAMES MACK (CHAIR)
  • ALEXANDER RIGNEY (VICE CHAIR)
  • JAMES A HUTCHINGS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A community based organization whose mission is to provide a center for 6- 12th grade youth where they can learn, grow, serve, and have fun in a safe environment supported by caring volunteers and christian staff.

What it reported doing in 2017

We provide a center for 6-12th grade youth where they can learn, grow, serve, and have fun in a safe environment supported by caring volunteers and christian staff. We accomplish this through programs including homework assistance, drop-in times, art and music classes, service saturdays, weekend programs, a summer program, an anti-bullying education initiative, special events, and more. All programs are offered free of charge to any 6 -12th grade youth without discrimination.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.4%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 63.5%; rating input score 64

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.4% of revenue deployed · 63.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.