Rhandis Heart
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810982279
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Aubrey, TX, USA
- Phone
- 6822031818
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,000
- Expenses
- $500
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rhandi's heart nonprofit helps help family that are going through hardships when their child is in the hospital. Rhandi's heart also holds teen summit events to help families with one parents homes to help their sons and daughter get a blue print to life's journey.
What it reported doing in 2025
Rhandis Heart Teen Summit Lubbock, Texas Rhandis Heart hosted and participated in a Teen Summit event in Lubbock, Texas, designed to support and empower youth ages 1221. The summit focused on: Career exploration and decision-making Personal development and self-improvement Professional presence and leadership skills Motivational empowerment through guest speakers Participants attended workshops centered on making positive life choices, understanding career pathways, building confidence, and learning how to carry themselves with purpose and professionalism. We were honored to feature motivational speakers who encouraged attendees to believe in themselves, set goals, and pursue excellence in education and career development. To further support families and youth in attendance, Rhandis Heart also provided: Free meals during the event Grocery giveaways to families in need This initiative reflects our ongoing mission to uplift, equip, and invest in the next generation through education, mentorship, and community support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.8%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 96.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $500 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.