Rha Pennsylvania Nursing Homes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581758569
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- West Chester, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6103380662
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,390,608
- Expenses
- $11,390,608
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Tony Sanchez (Board Member)
- Edwin J Schaffer (Board Member)
- Michael G Curry (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rha/Pennsylvania nursing homes, inc. (the company), a not-for-profit corporation, owns and operates two skilled nursing facilities known as prospect park nursing center (prospect park) and pembrooke nursing and rehabilitation center (pembrooke). Prospect park is a 180-bed facility located in prospect park, Pennsylvania, and pembrooke is a 180-bed facility located in west chester, Pennsylvania.
What it reported doing in 2013
Provision of residential and health care services to the elderly via two skilled nursing facilities known as prospect park nursing center and pembrooke nursing and rehabilitation center. Prospect park is a 180-bed facility located in prospect park, Pennsylvania, and pembrooke is a 240-bed facility located in west chester, Pennsylvania.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.3% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.