Rgisc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742742037
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Laredo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9567181063
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,493,091
- Expenses
- $1,366,829
- Assets
- $932,780
- Liabilities
- $552,094
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUAN LIVAS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TRICIA CORTEZ (EXECUTIVE DI): $95,623 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
4. Aire clean air, public health & emissions reduction ethylene oxide (eto) delivered public education and outreach to inform residents about ethylene oxide emissions from commercial sterilization facilities and associated health risks identified by federal agencies. Activities included distributing informational materials, briefing community partners, and supporting residents in understanding and participating in federal regulatory processes regarding strengthened emissions standards designed to protect vulnerable populations. Fenceline eto monitoring & analysis completed quality assurance/quality control review and public release of independent eto air-monitoring data collected in 2023, in partnership with umass amherst. Results were communicated to the community and local officials to support awareness of potential exposure pathways and inform local public-health and environmental decision-making, reinforcing the importance of regulatory oversight and community-science collaboration. Eto town hall organized a citywide town hall in october 2024 to share air-monitoring findings, provide federal regulatory and health guidance, and offer a platform for residents to ask questions and interact with scientific and public-health experts. The event supported informed civic engagement and ensured the community had access to transparent information and next-step pathways related to emission reduction and health-protective policies. Border 2025 pm2.5 monitoring launched in october 2024 under the epas border 2025 initiative and in partnership with umass amherst, we piloted the siting of nineteen (19) low-cost air sensors near various ports of entry, transportation corridors, and throughout laredo to better understand cross-border air-quality impacts. Initial work focused on location scoping, equipment evaluation, community partner coordination, and establishing baseline protocols to capture fine particulate matter pollution associated with freight activity and commercial crossings, supporting future binational health and policy responses. Phase 1 planning developed technical pathways and operational protocols for the first phase of pm2.5 sensor deployment along key transportation routes. Activities included drafting data-collection standards, coordinating with institutional and community partners on host-site readiness, addressing binational coordination considerations, and establishing a transparent process for long-term data reporting and interpretation. Pm2.5 advocacy & education engaged in public education, policy tracking, and stakeholder briefings related to updated federal particulate matter standards, focusing on implications for border communities with high freight and traffic exposure. Supported efforts to increase public understanding of pm2.5 health risks, emphasize environmental-justice impacts, and advance local capacity to participate in regulatory processes. Flir camera & methane visualization tools used specialized optical equipment for public demonstrations, increasing community understanding of invisible heat-trapping gases. Methane flaring (mitchell foundation & commission shift) in partnership with commission shift and funded by mitchell foundation, rgisc worked to document oil-and-gas flaring activity and methane release across south Texas, with particular focus on rural communities and the lack of oversight by the states environmental regulatory agency, the railroad commission of Texas (rrc). We conducted various community town hall vents, shared visual evidence and environmental explanations, and supported conversations with partners and residents about risks associated with methane emissions and impacts to public health. This work helped elevate public-health concerns and advance collaborative approaches to reduce flaring, increase transparency, and protect frontline residents. 5. Arbol laredo isd rboles schoolyard forestry launched the first year of planning and design for adelante con arboles, a multi-year sch
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.9%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.9% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $942K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.