Revved Up Wishes Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 333705709
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- East Carondelet, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6187892562
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,849
- Expenses
- $31,849
- Assets
- $1,428
- Liabilities
- $1,428
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Aziz Fouad Elia (Director, President/CEO)
People named in this filing
- Michelle Denise Elia (Director, Treasurer/CFO)
- Aziz Fouad Elia (Director, President/CEO)
- Caitlin Elia (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable purposes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and exempt uunder Section 501(c)(3) of the Code (or the corresponding provisions of any laws of the State of Illinois and the United States Internal Revenue Law).
What it reported doing in 2025
Revved Up Wishes for Make-A-Wish Fundraising Event The Foundation organized and conducted a charitable fundraising event benefiting children facing serious illnesses through support of wish-granting activities and pediatric charitable causes. The event included sponsor participation, live and silent auctions, supervised vehicle experiences, and family-centered activities involving specialty and exotic vehicles. Approximately 27 wish children and their families directly participated in event activities, and more than 300 attendees participated overall. The event raised substantial charitable funds and increased public awareness for children's charitable causes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 7
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.5%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 7
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.5% of revenue deployed · 7.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.