Revive California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871680547
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Pasadena, CA, USA
Phone
6266968700
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voter Education, Registration
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,923
Expenses
$49,275
Assets
$148,365
Liabilities
$8

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHE AHN (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL TAN (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • CHE AHN (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL TAN (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • MARC LITTLE (SECRETARY, DIRECTOR (PART-YEAR))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Disciple and educate regarding the 5 pillars to revive California: prayer, leadership, evangelism, small groups, and reformation. For reformation, we disciple and train people to vote biblically (educate people on voting guides, policy commentary, awareness of California and federal bills, how to contact California and federal officials and representatives), and equip and encourage people to run for office.

What it reported doing in 2024

An event to honor israel was held in august of 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 33.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -69.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.