Revival on the River

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815000620
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Greenwood, MS, USA
Phone
6623743665
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Interfaith Coalitions
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Expenses
$8,511
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ETHAN OLTREMARI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ETHAN OLTREMARI (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTIN MATTOX (TREASURER)
  • AMANDA JEFCOAT (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization plans to use the proceeds to put on a day of worship service in greenwood, Mississippi. The event will provide various religious musical acts to the community in order to spread the word of christ and also bring racial reconciliation to the delta. Additionally, it will strive to provide other support to local mission services. Finally, organization will serve as support network for area churches, youth groups, and charitable organizations. The organization will also support local missions by providing a free outlet for them to set up information booths for their ministry or civic organization. The event gives these organizations a place to share and be seen by people who otherwise may never come-in contact with them.

What it reported doing in 2020

The organization used the proceeds to put on a day of worship service in greenwood, Mississippi. The event provided various religious musical acts to the community in order to spread the word of christ and also bring racial reconciliation to the delta.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.