Reve Kandale Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814109906
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bethesda, MD, USA
Phone
2027740593
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,074
Expenses
$102,652
Assets
$66,940
Liabilities
$7,153

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Sullivan (President, Board of Directors)
  • Julie Martel (Vice-President, Board of Directors)

People named in this filing

  • John Sullivan (President, Board of Directors)
  • Julie Martel (Vice-President, Board of Directors)
  • Pam Pendleton (Secretary and Board member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

REVE Kandale Foundation supports the educational, environmental, and other development activities of REVE Kandale, a community-based organization located in Kandale, Kwilu Province, DR Congo.

What it reported doing in 2024

REVE Kandale Foundation provided direct support to REVE Kandale, a community-based organization in the DR Congo. This included support for the following activity in 2024: completed a solar-powered water project, delivering 45,000 liters of water per month to Kandale and surrounding villages; began construction of first 3-classroom bloc of Gufwa-Gubila Secondary Schoo; expanded Ami du Livre, enrolling 68 children ages 3 to 5 in the early-learner programs; prepared for the upcoming girls soccer tounament by forming 32 teams with nearly 500 girls and holding "friendly matches" to get ready; maintained and expanded Kandale's community gardens.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.2%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 95%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.2% of revenue deployed · 95% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.