Retrouvaille of Austin

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205837387
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5129258762
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,637
Expenses
$12,055
Assets
$15,463

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JUAN CARLOS RINCON (CMNTY COORD)
  • ANA MILENA ARCILA (CMNTY COORDI)
  • JUAN QUEZADA (REGISTRATION)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Retrouvaille is a ministry program that is solely dedicated to providing the necessary support to help save marriages. The retrouvaille program consists of a weekend experience for couples with marital problems with a series of 6-12 post weekend sessions held over the subsequent 3 months. Particiant couples are taught communication skills and other relationship tools to help put their marriages in order again. The retrouvaille program is funded entirely through donations from program participants and others who are interested in preserving the institution of marriage.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024 retrouvalle held one weekend retreat on september 27th to 29th at cyj retreat center for couples with troubled marriages with 12 sessions to follow over the next 6 weeks. Retrouvaille also held support core meetings each month to cointinue the retrouvalle experience with couples who went through a weekend retreat.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.1%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.1% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.