Reta Training Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844291153
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Albany, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5414972960
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,000
- Expenses
- $37,348
- Assets
- $41,948
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AER TEALE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES BARRON (EXECUTIVE DI)
- AER TEALE (PRESIDENT)
- KEITH HARPER (FIRST VICE P)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Reta training institute (rti)'s mission is to ensure the professional development and education of veterans, transitioning veterans, college students, high school students and women in natural refrigeration (winr) in the industrial refrigeration industry. Reta training institute (rti) prepares veterans, transiting veterans, college students, high school students, winr and others to safely engage, train, and contribute to the industrial refrigeration industry. The rti will educate at the entry level, certify all students, and assist with placement into the refrigeration industry. Rti will ensure that our students develop the skills and sound knowledge of industrial refrigeration and the competencies essential for success and leadership in the growing industrial refrigeration workforce. Rti students will also generate practical and theoretical knowledge to better understand the world of industrial refrigeration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3,634.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -145.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -95.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.