Restory Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814467204
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Phone
- 4174134818
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,416
- Expenses
- $69,978
- Assets
- $61,603
- Liabilities
- $6,728
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA SEILER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & BOARD MEMBER)
People named in this filing
- RENE MARTIN (BOARD CHAIR)
- RENATA DALLAS (SECRETARY & TREASURER)
- LINDA SEILER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of restory ministries is to resource the assemblies of god to address sexual and relational issues. These purposes are carried out by consulting with pastors and ministry leaders, establishing and strengthening local ministries working in accordance with the purpose of restory, and by developing resources and materials
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, restory ministries provided biblical teaching and practical resources to equip churches and individuals to navigate lgbtq with truth and compassion. More than 90,000 people accessed our website, 800+ users viewed online equipping videos, and nearly 1,000 new subscribers received ministry updates and resources. The restoried24 national conference served 350 attendees from across the u.s. And canada through teaching sessions, testimonies, and ministry training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.9%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 75.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.9% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.