Restore Assemble Produce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811938413
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Kent, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2532232194
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $403,672
- Expenses
- $359,179
- Assets
- $130,014
- Liabilities
- $20,318
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSE RODRIGUEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- VAUDRY BROWN (PRESIDENT)
- LATASHA JACKSON-RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LATASHA JACKSON-RODRIGUEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $78,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Restore assemble produce (rap) mission is to promote the strengths and abilities of youth by providing services that empower and enrich each child to overcome life's challenges with confidence, competence, and success.
What it reported doing in 2024
Axios, a greek term meaning "to have value or be worthy," captures the outcome we desire for all axios mentor program participants. Rap's vision is one in which caring adults identify children and youths' needs, provide them with the tailor-made individualized tools, services and programs they need to create positive lives. As one of those tools, the axios program provides youth experiencing trauma with family and group therapy, trauma reducing activities, and wraparound services grounded in the evidence-based support for students experiencing trauma (sset) model and rap's proprietary children of separated and incarcerated parents mentoring (csip) strategy to address the unique traumas in a youth's life. We believe that when you change a child's life with positive reinforcements, you strengthen the family, which makes a healthy community and changes the world!
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $80.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $327K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.