Restoration Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010846888
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Junction City, KS, USA
- Phone
- 7853419499
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,580,962
- Expenses
- $1,889,585
- Assets
- $214,039
- Liabilities
- $481,114
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARL TAYLOR (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN TAYLOR (BOARD MEMBER): $42,304 total reported compensation
- JUONIAH MEGEE (HR DIRECTOR): $11,303 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The nbsp; restoration nbsp; center nbsp; inc nbsp; provides nbsp; individual nbsp; and nbsp; group nbsp; session nbsp; for nbsp; clientsbased nbsp; on nbsp; their nbsp; needs nbsp; according nbsp; to nbsp; criteria nbsp; along nbsp; with nbsp; the nbsp; dsm nbsp; iv nbsp; each nbsp; client nbsp; is nbsp; provided nbsp; a nbsp; monthly nbsp; treatment nbsp; plan nbsp; updated nbsp; to nbsp; assist nbsp; them nbsp; in nbsp; staying nbsp; focused nbsp; on nbsp; their nbsp; goals nbsp; and nbsp; moving nbsp; through nbsp; treatment nbsp; based nbsp; on nbsp; their nbsp; progress
What it reported doing in 2024
29,500 value of free drug and alcohol counciling service provided to the junction city area. 28,500 value of free drug and alcohol counciling service provide to the manhattan area. 24,900 value of free drug and alcohol counciling service provided to the wichita area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 26
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.5%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.25; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 29 current checks pass · 4 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX DepreciationDepletion column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.