Respite Endowment Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 352465993
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2014–2017
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2017
Location: Lisle, IL, USA
Rating: 56
Verdict: MIXED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue: $17,475
Expenses: $18,265
Assets: $1,407
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Rebecca Pundy (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

Alex Pundy (Executve Director)
Rebecca Pundy (Executive Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule O

What it reported doing in 2017

Advertising for Fund Raiser

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 34
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 35
Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 34.2%; rating input score 34
Program expense ratio: 32.8%; rating input score 33

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 32.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 47.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -21.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 34.2% of revenue deployed · 32.8% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.