Resources for Medical Education And

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262617823
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Durango, CO, USA
Phone
9703753649
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$350,251
Expenses
$666,542
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to advance evidence based medicine and improve health care quality by supporting education and collaborative research, locally and globally. We currently support the following programs: Belize Spine Program2nd Annual Biologics Collaborative: Evidence in Spine and OrthopedicsOsteobiologics Registry (Initiative)Medical Internships for Pre-Medical StudentsThis year marked our 5th year in operation and it also marks our last year of operations. With many great accomplishments detailed in each program below, the Board of Directors made the decisions to dissolve and transfer its programs following personnel changes in early November. Although this is a bittersweet end to RMEC, it brings new life to two of our programs that have made great strides in the last two years, the Belize Spine Program and the Biologics Collaborative. Each of these programs have been transitioned to a 501c3 that shares a similar mission to RMEC and the program specifically.

What it reported doing in 2012

BRINGING SPINE HEALTH CARE AND ON-SITE MEDICAL EDUCATIONTO THE DEVELOPING WORLDBELIZE SPINE PROGRAMRMEC established the goal to partner with communities and hospitals indeveloping countries to improve access to quality spine care by:1) Promoting excellent clinic management from diagnosis to follow up;2) Training orthopedic surgeons in diagnosing and treating spine pathology;3) Developing educational programs to sustain community access to qualityspine care;4) Establishing strong bilateral partnerships.Over the course of two years, a relationship with Karl Heusner Memorial Hospital in Belize City was developed; KHMH is the first location that RMEC is supporting the development of a sustainable spine clinic pursuant to our mission stated above.Why KHMH and Belize? Karl Heusner Memorial Hospital is the main referring center in Belize. It is estimated that KHMH has a draw of about one million people, which includes the Belize populous of 350,000 and pull from surrounding countries. On average, KHMH sees about 135 patients a day and most of these are trauma cases. With this large populous, the Belize community is in need of a clinic well-trained in treating spinal pathologies and spine trauma.Orthopedic surgeons at KHMH perform a limited number of spine surgeries, primarily focusing on basic cases and trauma cases. The orthopedic surgeons are very cautious about complex and instrumented cases, as they have limited access to the required instrument trays and devices, as well as lack the needed continuing education in diagnosing spinal pathology and surgical trainings in advanced techniques. To compound the delivery of care, approximately 50% of surgeons in Belize are foreign-born; the surgeons at KHMH operate under diverse educational and training backgrounds. This disparity in surgeon training poses challenges in establishing standards of care at KHMH and results in disparate treatments and perspectives in providing spine care.To summarize, KHMH is in need of continuing and specialized education programs in diagnosing and treating spinal pathologies, as well as in need of updated instrument trays, devices, and technology. Lastly, and importantly, KHMH is open to a partnership that will improve access to quality spine care for their patient population.The Belize Spine Program is a tailored, bilateral, clinical, and educational outreach program addressing the needs of patients seeking treatment for a spinal pathology.The program began small; in February, 2011, Dr. Williams and Ms. George traveled to Belize and treated two adult patients, as well as holding clinic. In May 2011, Dr. Williams, Dr. Youssef, and Dr. George returned for the 3-month follow up and clinic, as well as further relationship building. February 2012 marked the one-year anniversary of the BSP; Dr. Williams and Ms. George returned to perform four more life changing surgeries, alongside the Belizean team, held clinic, and supported educational talks. In August 2012, a team of six (Dr. Williams, Dr. Moulton, Ms. George (RN), an OR specialist, a Certified Neurophysiologic Intraoperative Monitor (CNIM), and an assistant) traveled to Belize prepared to treat the 13 year old seen previously in clinic in February, as well as two adult patients. During the one-week trip in August 2012, fourteen patients were evaluated in clinic, three patients received life changing surgical treatment, critical educational opportunities for a number of physicians were supported, and steps toward greater collaboration were made. Numerous pathologies were seen in clinic including degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar arthodesis, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Scheuermann's Kyphosis, spina bifida/ mylomeningocele, dysphagia due to cervical spine procedures, and cases where additional tests were needed before a diagnosis could be made. Three patients seen in clinic were operated on throughout the week ahead. The cases included the following: (1) a 54 year old w

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -90.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -82.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $570K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $51K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.