Resource Renewal Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680038012
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fairfax, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4159283774
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $244,632
- Expenses
- $655,175
- Assets
- $1,065,854
- Liabilities
- $160,705
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBORAH MOSKOWITZ (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DEBORAH MOSKOWITZ (PRESIDENT): $122,919 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
What it reported doing in 2025
Public landsrestore point reyes national seashore: advocating for the public and wildlife in a beloved national park.after a decade of advocacy, rri celebrated a landmark settlement to end nearly all commercial ranching within the seashore by 2026, paving the way for large-scale restoration, improved visitor access, and public recreation. Our agreement with nps and 18 ranch leaseholders resulted in a settlement to wind down cattle operations on 17,000 acres of parkland. Once the terms of the agreement have been met, our lawsuit will be dismissed. We are developing and coordinating the transition support plan in partnership with the nature conservancy, providing payments to displaced ranch workers and tenants whom we advocated for from the very beginning of the process. We helped secure a 2.7m. Grant to fund infrastructure removal including miles of barbed-wire fencing and to plan for habitat restoration and monitoring across an initial 3,000 acres of degraded parklands. We're working with tribal governments, partner organizations, and legislative leaders to secure more restoration funding.collaboration and engagement: local and global partnerships.rri continues to lead in coalition building and policy influence at the regional, state, and global levels. Rri staff co-led California's delegation at the un biodiversity conference in santiago de cali, colombia. Closer to home, we work in partnership with many state and local environmental organizations that strengthen science-based environmental policy while amplifying rri's leadership, reputation, and reach. We continue to collaborate with a wide range of groups: California global biodiversity alliance, power in nature coalition, California biodiversity network, California public lands network, California aquaculture coalition, California bycatch coalition, bay delta tribal and environmental legislative coalition, endangered species coalition, greenlatinos public lands and ocean collective, roadless rule defense coalition, american the beautiful for all coalition, global alliance for the rights of nature (north american hub).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -167.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $524K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.