Resort Corridor Mobility Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843550693
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Henderson, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7024009859
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $21,657
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHARLES BERRY (CHAIRMAN)
- KARLOS LASANE II (VICE CHAIRMAN)
- STEVE SCHUTTE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the common business interests of businesses in the las vegas resort corridor by providing a forum for business enterprises in the las vegas resort corridor to address common transportation and mobility concerns and to work cooperatively with local government to mitigate traffic congestion through improved coordination, cooperation and communication, to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution and parking needs and to promote and advocating for efficient mobility and transportation systems that will enhance the las vegas resort corridor's competitiveness and economic vitality.
What it reported doing in 2021
Providing a forum for business enterprises in the las vegas resort corridor to address common transportation and mobility concerns and to work cooperatively with local government to mitigate traffic congestion through improved coordination, cooperation and communication between private, not for profit and government stakeholders and various transportation demand management and transportation systems management programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -108.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.