Resolana

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205214509
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Euless, TX, USA
Phone
2146812440
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Financial Counseling

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$264,123
Expenses
$270,987
Assets
$139,123
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Developing and implementing holistic programming for incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women. Resolana proves gender-specific programming and case management to female offenders, beginning inside the Dallas county jail and continuing through reentry into the community. The mission is to educate and empower incarcerated women. Our goals are to increase readiness for change on the inside, increase utilization of existing community resources on the outside, and reduce recidivism.

What it reported doing in 2012

In fiscal year 2013 (July 12, 2012-June 30, 2013) Resolana served 492 women, conducting classes, providing reentry planning, and facilitating a modified social learning community behind bars. 1095 classes were held on topics designed to address core issues underlying women's criminal involvement. With high rates of addiction and histories of physical and sexual abuse in the jail population, topics included staying safe, 12 steps, coping skills, anger management, grief and loss, and parenting, as most incarcerated women are mothers who live with multiple minor children.The women are housed together in a self-contained jail unit, adjacent to our classroom and isolated from the general jail population. There they are immersed in the kind of structured and supportive social learning community that research shows improve outcomes. 153 community meetings were held to facilitate the social environment.Resolana provided 355 case management conferences, focusing on crisis stabilization and reentry planning. All clients complete a reentry plan within one week of entry into the program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $177K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.