Resilient Village Collective Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920809626
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3123711856
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,000
- Expenses
- $50,312
- Assets
- $46,935
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James L Miles Sr (President)
People named in this filing
- James L Miles Sr (President)
- Denise Miles-Francois (Treasurer)
- Kelli Powell (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
3. RVC provides evidence based and trauma informed resilience, stress mitigation, self-governance, and group coherence training to 1st Responders, US Military Veterans, and their families. This training is geared to help reduce suicide rates and other prolonged negative outcomes trends frequently exhibited among the woman and men serving in these areas. RVC primarily provides this training to groups of US Military Veterans, their families and 1st Responders, government, faith-based and community leaders. This training is delivered through onsite and online platforms and tools.
What it reported doing in 2024
3) Advisory, Coaching, and participatory research - we completed two Patient Centered outcome research initiative that trained 15 youth and adults to be violence reduction, peer-support practitioners in their communities. We've upgraded our data capture and measurement lab-kits to incorporate increased heart-brain measurement capacity. Our online platform is now used with all team training clients engagements so the participants now have 24hour access to the training and practice material through an online LMS. We trained over 100 township employees from the Stickney Township, 65 Air Force officer and enlisted senior leaders and are helping a 50 year old housing service nonprofit team design improve their client facing services. We're working with the Nasville police department in a pilot program collaboration so far 52 officers have gone through the program. Our discounted services allow the Nashaville PD training to be thrid party funded so we can reach more officers and in turn have a greater impact on police community relations validate through measurable variables.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 71.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 166.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.