Resilience Resource Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932112270
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hatboro, PA, USA
Phone
2673691700
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,168
Expenses
$80,962
Assets
$32,642
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Kai Howard (Administrative Director)
  • Jacqueline Harrison (Program Director)
  • Dana Amber Newman (Communication Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To foster and build resilience skills in marginalized communities by providing accessible mental health services, fostering and building safe-space educational environments, and teaching career skills designed to bring about positive social change and to improve the quality of life for martginalized individuals and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

RRC_Accomplishments_2024_2025_Youth_Community_Hours_1060_Low_Cost_Mental_Health_Sessions_944_Subsidized_Mental_Health_Sessions_226_Free_Mental_Health_Sessions_141_Percent_Subsidized_Mental_Health_Sessions_24_Community_Space_Hours_2548_Career_Counseling_Sessions_37_Free_Career_Counseling_Sessions_95_Total_Events_and_Outreach_294

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.9%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 20%; rating input score 20

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 68.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 73.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.9% of revenue deployed · 20% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.