Resilience Dance Company Stl

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871484854
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
5134446114
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$232,570
Expenses
$239,858
Assets
$5,397
Liabilities
$676

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HOLLY SEITZ MARCHANT (PRESIDENT)
  • BRITTNI JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMILY HAUSSLER (EXECUTIVE AND ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $23,803 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create exceptional dance experiences that fuel human connection.

What it reported doing in 2024

Dance educationrdc provides multiple forms of dance education to the community.rdc hosts open drop-in classes four to five times a week for intermediate and advanced students, usually ages 16+, in st. Louis. These classes primarily include ballet, contemporary, modern, improvisation, and pilates. Furthermore, rdc hosted 7 master classes led by rdc's guest choreographers and visiting festival artists. In total, throughout the 2024/25 season, there were 309 class attendance from 128 students a 55% increase and 39% increase respectively from 23/24.rdc hosted three summer programs to support dance education for students ages 11-18. 18 students attended across the 3 programs, which included an open int/adv summer intensive for ages 11-18, a pre-pro intensive for high schoolers, and the choreography intensive an immersive experience for high school students which accepts based on auditions. Students in the first two programs took technique classes including modern, improvisation, and ballet, workshops including partnering and choreography, and special sessions on "mental health in dance", led by licensed counselor and board member brittni johnson, and "injury prevention", led by elizabeth westland, rdc's partner physical therapist. Pre-professional students learned and performed company rep, while summer intensive students worked on a new piece by an rdc company dancer. Both programs ended in mini studio performances, attended by a total of 70 audience members. Students in choreography intensive took morning technique class followed by an immersive rehearsal process with rdc choreographer will brighton, creating a new piece that premiered at the st. Louis contemporary dance festival. They also had access to wellness workshops led by rdc partners.lastly, rdc piloted our first youth education outreach program: readysetdance!, created for st. Louis public library's live at slpl series. This one-hour long interactive presentation performance introduces children ages 3-10 to contemporary dance, inspiring them to use their own creative voices and explore movement in the framework of time, space, and effort. Rdc reached 131 audience members with this workshop at two library locations.rdc provides rigorous yet nurturing dance education for students at affordable rates. Rdc fulfills our mission by connecting students with high-quality training in diverse techniques in addition to providing professional opportunities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.3%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $65.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 42.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.3% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $204K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $24K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.