Research Study Club of Los Angeles

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
951648188
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Dimas, CA, USA
Phone
8666414797
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$101,950
Expenses
$147,751
Assets
$167,097

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PETER J CORNELL MD (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • GEORGE M RAJACICH MD (DIRECTOR/TREASURER)
  • PETER J CORNELL MD (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • NICOLE FRAM MD (DIRECTOR/PROGRAMS CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Form 990-ez, part iii-organizations primary exempt purposethe research study club , in fulfilling its purpose of the encouragement and cultivation of the study and research in themedical fields of otolaryngology and ophthalmology for themutual advancement and benefit of its members, sponsors a one-day clinical conference, engaging lecturers of reputeand knowledge of those subjects, and engages the lecture halls and contacts appropriate exhibitors, charges admissionfor the lectures paid by the members and exhibitors in orderto help defray expenses of same and for the purpose of organization, and to provide the distinguished speakers withan honorarium, hotel, airline and ground transportation andmeals. Physicians attending this conference receive credittoward continuing medical education and the ama physiciansrecognition award. Any physician who attends the conferenceis considered a participating member.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -44.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.