Rescue Humanity Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205704410
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Irvine, CA, USA
Phone
9497571450
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,029
Expenses
$125,263
Assets
$8,573
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL A NASSIE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL A NASSIE (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provides free medical and dental services to the underserved, poor and indigent in nepal and other third world countries.

What it reported doing in 2023

1. Rescue humanity has formed project nepal, which provides medical care to the poor of nepal. Rescue humanity has organized several trips to nepal with volunteer medical and dental professionals to assist the underprivileged in remote areas of the himalayan mountains.2. Dental clinics have been held in nepal to provide training on dental hygiene and distribute toothbrushes and other dental supplies.3. Rescue humanity has also opened an orphanage (the rainbow house) in kathmandu, nepal, that provides food, clothing, shelter, education and medical care to underprivileged and orphaned children.4. Rescue humanity has a safe house (sharan house) in kathmandu, nepal where women and children are rescued from human trafficking.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 50.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 65% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.