Repro TLC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208336719
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Berwyn, IL, USA
Phone
7083288488
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,241,056
Expenses
$3,007,845
Assets
$2,237,361
Liabilities
$149,606

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sabia Wade (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Latona Giwa (Executive Dir.): $144,267 total reported compensation
  • Melissa Banerjee (Deputy Director): $107,793 total reported compensation
  • Dominique Mackey (Strategic Dir): $100,524 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Repro TLC improves access to comprehensive reproductive health care by training providers in abortion and miscarriage care, contraception, pregnancy options counseling, and beyond. Rooted in the Midwest, Repro TLC fills gaps nationwide in clinical training and education, and mobilizes its network to advocate for more just and equitable reproductive care.

What it reported doing in 2025

1) Through the Individual Clinical Training Program, Repro TLC does not itself provide any medical care. Instead, Repro TLC serves as a link between physicians, advanced practice clinicians, nurses, and students/trainees of these professions who want to obtain training in reproductive healthcare and clinical sites that actually perform procedures in the areas of abortion, miscarriage care, contraception, etc. Repro TLC connects those seeking training to clinical sites that can provide such training. All trainees are supervised by and subject to the rules and regulations of the clinical sites, and Repro TLC is not present on site at any of these locations.2) Through the Provider & Community Education Program, Repro TLC develops and provides informative workshops for healthcare providers, community-based groups, and individuals, as well as at certain national and regional conferences. The topics relate to the provision of reproductive healthcare. Educational sessions are created and facilitated by third-party independent educators. 3) Through the Provider Movement Building Program, Repro TLC promotes healthcare provider community building for change. Through relationship building, we share information, create networking opportunities for current and future providers, and advocate to reduce barriers to training in reproductive healthcare.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 72% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $418.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.