Renewing Life Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 432072144
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7024347290
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,789,641
- Expenses
- $1,935,745
- Assets
- $2,859,104
- Liabilities
- $-11,044
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Jennifer Antonucci (Board Member Center Director): $108,000 total reported compensation
- Mark Whelchel (Board Member Center Director): $108,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Renewing Life Center provides clinical and pastoral counseling that fosters and cares for church pastors and their families. RLC provided 15,098 counseling visits during this fiscal year. RLC also had a number of participants in marriage and parenting classes. RLC provided more than 250,000 in donated counseling services to those who otherwise could not afford to pay for the needed care. 68% of all cash sessions were donated or provided at a reduced rate. RLC provide Spiritual Formation and Direction to more than 50 individuals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Renewing Life Center had 15,098 counseling visits in 2025 and of those visits RLC provided more than 250,000 in donated services to those who could not afford to pay or could only pay at a greatly reduced cost based on a sliding fee scale. RLC continues to fill a great need in the Las Vegas Valley in counseling both individuals and families. The stresses of daily life family marriage and the economical challenges continue to present themselves in the clients we serve. RLC has partnered with numerous churches and local organizations; such as Refuge for Women Victims of Crime and the local Rescue Mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 82% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 11 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $101K reported
- Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.