Renewed Woman Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223367000
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Stanhope, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9736911073
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,138
- Expenses
- $3,857
- Assets
- $3,879
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOROTHY M FOOTE (PRESIDENT)
- ERIK FOOTE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DOROTHY M FOOTE (PRESIDENT)
- PASTER LINDA BELLINI (TRUSTEE)
- ERIK FOOTE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was created to establish a multicultural, multiracial, nondenominational ministry that ministers to the whole person; spiritually, mentally, and physically. We attempt to mend broken people as we advance the gospel of Jesus Christ through annual conferences, bible study groups, and other events using practical biblical principles. This is done by using lectures, music, multimedia, dramatic performances, community events, and any other appropriate means.
What it reported doing in 2022
In an effort to continually offer hope and encouragement to people, on a wider scale we purchase quarterly devotionals from The Word For You Today Ministry of Alpharetta, GA. Renewed Woman, Inc. sends them out as a gift, but accepts donations. We've done this in the past finding these devotionals to be very effective as a ministry tool.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -28.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.