Renew America Together Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832442049
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Little Rock, AR, USA
Phone
5012449522
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Government and Public Administration

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$231,584
Expenses
$368,928
Assets
$40,013
Liabilities
$30

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY LEE SMITH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY LEE SMITH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $155,441 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and achieve greater common ground in america by reducing partisan division and gridlock. Our mission is to revitalize public and political discourse by teaching and promoting civics, citizenship and civility.

What it reported doing in 2024

Outreach & education: renew america together uses a historical perspective to explore american civility and place today's partisan atmosphere in proper context. American democracy has always been conflictual and dynamic by design-founded on the principle of e pluribus unum ("out of many, one") and sustained by the ongoing competition of ideas, values, and priorities among the american people. This history is best understood through overlapping political, economic, and increasingly global cycles that span decades.for the past century, the united states has managed to balance action and reaction with limited acrimony and little bloodshed, thanks to a functioning system of checks and balances operating at many levels. Yet there is no guarantee that history will not repeat itself, nor that future cycles will remain as stable. Continued competition is inevitable so long as our government is based on a constitution that separates powers and ensures each branch can check and balance the others.the central questions are: are our institutions healthy enough to withstand the challenges ahead? Is our population informed, educated, and engaged enough to protect democracy? Do we share a sufficient commitment to civics, civility, and citizenship to address our differences? And can our electorate see through the divisiveness of media, special interests, and partisan politics to demand genuine progress on the major issues facing our nation? Renew america together brings these questions into the public square through three key initiatives:1. The civility leadership institute (cli) - a flagship, year-long program that equips community leaders with communication skills and practical tools to bridge divides.2. Town hall and small-group dialogues - discussions with civic, political, and economic leaders focused on real-world collaboration.3. Workshops and curricula - teaching the serve and trust frameworks, which provide citizens with accessible tools to practice civil dialogue and combat disinformation.in 2024, renew america together created two new curricula-serve and trust-focused on strengthening civil dialogue and media literacy. These half-day programs empower participants to make an immediate impact in their communities and are now used with cli alumni, nonprofit groups, universities, and civic organizations nationwide. Ongoing evaluation ensures that each program continues to expand its reach and effectiveness.our flagship civility leadership institute (cli) brings together approximately 30 leaders per cohort from across the country for a year of training and dialogue designed to find common ground. Participants represent diversity across age, gender, race, political affiliation, geography, and occupation. Each applicant articulates how they will benefit from participation and later reports on how the program has influenced their work and lives.graduates of the cli have applied their learning in measurable ways-co-authoring inclusive workplace policies, assuming new leadership roles, speaking publicly about civility, writing articles, launching podcasts, and even co-drafting legislation to support mothers. In our first cohort, 96.4% of participants reported successfully applying lessons from the program in their professional or community roles.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 16
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.3%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 13
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -59.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 42.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.3% of revenue deployed · 13.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.