Rende Progress Capital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820689514
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Grand Rapids, MI, USA
- Phone
- 6165583276
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $554,143
- Expenses
- $488,450
- Assets
- $3,425,437
- Liabilities
- $154,413
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- Eric K Foster (Chair and Director)
- Cuong Q Huynh (Board Treasurer & General Manager)
- Timothy Williams (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
RPC is committed to economic equity by providing socially responsible and affordable lending and responsible and affordable lending and services to entrepreneurs who have been excluded from traditional lending due to socio-economic reasons & bias.
What it reported doing in 2025
For FY 2025, Rende Progress Capital RPC continued uninterrupted delivery of our two core services of 1 small business micro lending and 2 free business Technical Assistance TA to diverse entrepreneurs in our primary market of Kent County, Kalamazoo, Muskegon, and Holland. A FY 2025 Q2 loan deal to a Southeast Michigan adult home care business marked the extension of RPC lending in a fifth county, Wayne County. The aforementioned FY 2025 core services, standard operations portfolio management and loan servicing with customers, launch of our pilot Early Stage Loan and new focus on lending to more high-growth businesses contributed to five additional loan deals including continuing our trend of individual six-figure loans to a high-growth communications and event planning business and an early-stage high-quality day care business. As a non-profit CDFI small business lender with a mission of social impact, FY 2025 also was a continuation of our distinctive from traditional finance institutions as we used credit enhancements to reduce borrower payment obligations, mitigate first-time new borrower closing fees and develop incentives to assist approved borrowers with collateral constraints. FY 2025 TA marked our growth in the second essential RPC service of business technical assistance TA with the hiring of a new strategic focused position of Manager for Business Engagement and Cultivation. This position coordinated free business fundamental consultation to 1 RPC loan customers to grow their business and reduce the probability of having problem loans with us and 2 TA to select non-customers focused on their participation in our pre-loan readiness incubator to prepare them in readiness in the process of loan applications and potentially becoming RPC loan customers. The main TA program for FY 2025 was the inaugural Q3 Pre-Loan Readiness Cohort of six specially selected non-RPC customer businesses to learn about readiness for business lending---which contributed to cash awards for all participants and one participant applying for a RPC loan, which was approved.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 45.2%; rating input score 45
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.01; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 45.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $221K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.